appana TechnologiesUAE · AI innovation

Fact-checking

Check the claim against something that can be cited.

Build this with us

FROM POSSIBILITY TO PRACTICE

What it does for your business

For your business and knowledge team, “Fact-checking” can become a repeatable workflow rather than a separate task handled from scratch each time. AI can compare the supplied material with agreed criteria, highlight differences and assemble the evidence a reviewer needs. It fits into document preparation, internal communication and information retrieval, using your business information and the standards your team already works to.

The value it could bring

These are the improvements to evaluate against your current process. We agree the scope and test the value with your team.

Useful information sooner

Turn business knowledge into material people can find and act on, with less repeated assembly and editing.

A faster first pass

Focus reviewers on the differences and exceptions that need judgement instead of starting every review from a blank page.

More consistent checks

Apply the same agreed criteria across items and make the reasons behind a finding easier to inspect.

EVIDENCE FROM OTHER BUSINESSES

Published ROI evidence

We have not linked a comparable published financial ROI study for this use case yet. That leaves it unranked, rather than assigning an estimated score. A pilot can measure benefits and total implementation and running costs in your business.

How it works in your business

  1. STEP 1

    Bring in the right context

    Select the relevant information from your document repository, office tools and internal knowledge base. Agree what a good result looks like with your business and knowledge team, including the rules, examples and permissions the workflow needs.

  2. STEP 2

    Turn the task into a workflow

    Check the claim against something that can be cited. Apply the agreed rules consistently, explain the items that need attention and link findings back to the source rather than presenting an unexplained verdict.

  3. STEP 3

    Put the result to work

    Give the reviewer a prioritised set of findings with supporting context and an editable record of the outcome. Document owners verify factual claims, references and access permissions before sharing the result.

AN EXAMPLE IN PRACTICE

A member of your business and knowledge team needs help with “Fact-checking”. They supply approved source documents and relevant business records, together with the relevant instructions and the result they need. The workflow prepares an initial result with its supporting context, flags missing information and returns it for review. The owner can correct it and use the accepted result in the team's document repository, office tools and internal knowledge base.

Start with a focused pilot

Choose one workflow, one team and a representative set of real tasks. We establish the current baseline, build the first version and review the results together before expanding it.

What we would start with

Depending on the scope, useful inputs include:

  • Approved source documents and relevant business records
  • Templates, writing standards and audience requirements
  • Examples of accepted output and required references

We agree access and integration with your document repository, office tools and internal knowledge base as part of the design.

How we would measure value

  • Time to complete a reviewed item
  • Confirmed findings and incorrect flags
  • Time to an accepted document or a verified answer

Document owners verify factual claims, references and access permissions before sharing the result.

LET’S BUILD IT TOGETHER

Could this help your business?

Tell us how your team works today and what you would like to improve. We’ll explore the opportunity, shape a practical first step and build it with you.

Talk to us about this use case